top of page

Screw retained crown on Prama implant in aesthetic area 

Dr. Paolo Nardinocchi, DT Valerio Zarroli, Camaioni Odontotecnici Laboratory Teramo

​

The patient came to the clinic with a deep fracture of the 2.1 element that had affected the buccal wall. The tooth had a very short root but was mobile as it ankylosed. The restoration started from the extraction of the fractured element and the insertion of a Prama implant in a prosthetically ideal position: the emergence of the neck is positioned at the level of the apical margin of the adjacent teeth, being careful not to come in contact with the buccal bone plate. This type of positioning is contraindicated when using tissue level implants with divergent or cylindrical neck because, being inserted in a more palatal position to avoid future recession of hard and soft tissues, they would force a prosthesis with a horizontal over-contour that could negatively influence the elimination of plaque by the patient, thus precluding the possibility of a cemented prosthesis due to the difficulty of removing excess cement. In this case, thanks to this positioning, it would have been possible to realize a definitive crown both screw retained or cemented. A screw retained crown was chosen, taking advantage of the benefits of the angulation offered by the Interfase Dynamica supports.

​

“The Prama implant allowed me to plan an ideal rehabilitation from the prosthetic point of view, positioning the emergence of the convergent neck at the level of the coronal edge of the adjacent teeth. This way it was possible to create a screw retained crown in the aesthetic area with an ideal and very natural emergence profile, also thanks to the possibility of realizing an angled prosthesis using the Interfase Dynamica.”

cit. Dr. Paolo Nardinocchi and DT Valerio Zarroli

bottom of page